"Peter Phaal" <peter.phaal@inmon.com> writes:
> Here is a new definition for the Extended OpenFlow structure that better
> addresses your points:
This looks good to me.
Since OpenFlow is not a final standard, it would be good to
either specify a particular version of OpenFlow (in case the bit
fields change in later versions) or to somehow include a version
number in the packet.
Received on Wed Oct 14 12:21:22 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 02/17/10 PST