Re: Re: sFlow and OpenFlow

From: Ben Pfaff <>
Date: 10/14/09
Message-ID: <>

"Peter Phaal" <> writes:

> Here is a new definition for the Extended OpenFlow structure that better
> addresses your points:

This looks good to me.

Since OpenFlow is not a final standard, it would be good to
either specify a particular version of OpenFlow (in case the bit
fields change in later versions) or to somehow include a version
number in the packet.
Received on Wed Oct 14 12:21:22 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 02/17/10 PST