From: Kazuaki Tsuchiya (email@example.com)
Thank you for making me clear.
I will be looking forward to the new RFC for the version 5!
-- Kazuaki Tsuchiya, Hitachi.
At 01:55 03/07/01 +0900, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>Once the content of the sFlow version 5 specification has been finalized by
>sFlow.org participants it will be submitted to the IETF for publication as
>an informational RFC.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of
> > Kazuaki Tsuchiya
> > Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 6:15 AM
> > To: email@example.com
> > Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
> > Subject: Re: [sFlow] Finalizing sFlow Version 5
> > Dear Peter
> > Let me clarify one point.
> > Do you have a plan to make the version 5 a RFC
> > like the version 4(RFC3176)? Which working group?
> > (or no relationship with the IETF?)
> > Thanks.
> > -- Kazuaki Tsuchiya, Hitachi.
> > At 02:50 03/06/12 +0900, email@example.com wrote:
> > >It's time to finalize the sFlow version 5 specification so
> > that it can be
> > >published. The current drafts are available at:
> > >http://www.sflow.org/developers/specifications.php
> > >
> > >Please review the current specifications and send any comments to the
> > >mailing list before the end of June.
> > >
> > >Regards,
> > >Peter
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 06/30/03 PDT